News | Policy initiatives | Acidification & Eutrophication | Air quality | Climate Change| Publications | Events | Links | The Secretariat
 








 

Climate Change > Political development


Political development

The basis of international policy for cutting down emissions of greenhouse gases is the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. It was signed in 1992 and came into effect in 1994.

It has as an "ultimate objective" the stabilizing of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere "at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic (human-induced) interference with the climate system."

It is a stated principle of the convention that the industrialized nations, being responsible for by far the greatest part of the emissions, both now and in the past, should take the lead in combating climate change and its damaging effects.

The Kyoto protocol

A first step towards quantified commitments as a means of attaining the aim of the climate convention was taken when the Kyoto Protocol was signed in 1997. It entered into force in February 2005.

Under this protocol the industrialized nations have made legally binding undertakings with regard to their emissions of greenhouse gases for the period 1990 to 2008-2012 (average for the five years). Some countries will be allowed to increase their emissions, or freeze them at current levels, but most will have to make reductions (see table below). The overall reduction for the so-called Annex I countries (those listed in the table below) was expected to be 5.2 per cent when the protocol was signed.

The protocol embraces six greenhouse gases that are combined in a "basket", so that individual gases are translated into CO2 equivalents, which are then added up to produce a single figure.

Emissions from aviation and marine bunker fuels used in international transport do not enter into any national undertakings.

Increases:  
+10% Iceland
+8% Australia
+1% Norway
Freezing:  
0% New Zealand, Russia, Ukraine
Reductions:  
-5% Croatia
-6% Canada, Hungary, Japan, Poland
-7% USA
-8% EU15 (collectively), Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Romania, Switzerland, Slovakia and Slovenia.


The United States - which answered for a good third of the Annex I countries' emissions of carbon dioxide in 1990 and has the world's largest emissions per capita - abandoned the protocol in 2001, with the excuse that it excluded 80 per cent of the world's population and would, moreover, be detrimental to the US economy.

In February 2002, President Bush presented a national policy on climate change, with voluntary targets that are likely to lead to an increase in emissions of more than 30 per cent over 1990 levels by 2010.

This increase in emissions in the US, combined with full exploitation of carbon sinks, is estimated to mean that the Annex I countries will increase their combined emissions over the period 1990-2012, instead of reducing them.

What will happen after 2012?

Negotiations concerning the next period for commitments (after 2012) has now started. So far, most of the developing countries have rejected all suggestions that they should cut emissions, maintaining that it is the rich countries that have caused the problem and they should therefore be the first to deal with it.

But the developing countries' emissions are increasing. The industrialized (Annex I) countries are most likely to demand some form of binding commitment from the developing ones for the period after 2012.

The progress in the Post-Kyoto process is regularly reported in Acid News, see links to relevant articles in the right hand column.



 

Climate Action Network Europe. Umbrella for European environmental organizations. (external link)

UNFCCC.
Official website of the UN Climate Convention, featuring convention documents, national reports and other information. (external link)

Political development. Chapter 9 in the secretariat's book Air and the Environment (2004).

EU on climate change (this website)

The Kyoto protocol. Factsheet from the secretariat, February 2003.

Back to top


Last modified: 27 March 2008.

 
March 2008
EU wants to show the way – but is aiming low
The EU Commission’s climate package calls for a 20-per-cent reduction in emissions
Read more »

December 2007
Massive emission reductions needed
To limit global warming to 2°C above pre-industrial levels, emissions from the ..
Read more »

December 2007
“The time for doubt has passed”
In the run-up to the Climate Conference in December the Intergovern­mental Panel ..
Read more »

September 2007
Slow progress in climate negotiations
The Vienna Climate Change Talks 2007 failed to produce agreement on important ..
Read more »

June 2007
Last gasp of the coal industry?
It is the coal industry that benefits most from interest in methods for collecting and trapping carbon dioxide.
Read more »

March 2007
EU leaders agree on new climate target
The Spring Council meeting of EU heads of government i Brussels on 8–9 March ..
Read more »

December 2006
Car industry fails
Fifteen of Europe´s twenty major car manufacturers have failed to improve ..
Read more »

December 2006
Heroes and zeroes in the EU Kyoto race
The EU can meet its Kyoto target. But the margin is small and success ..
Read more »

December 2006
Mistrust in Nairobi
Lack of confidence between industrialized and developing countries remains a major ..
Read more »

February 2006
Mixed reactions to Montreal conference
When the UN Climate Change Conference in Montreal concluded on the morning ..
Read more »

November 2005
Second European Climate Change Programme
The purpose of the new programme is to provide a new policy framework for ..
Read more »

June 2005
New EU climate targets adopted
EU heads of state have for the first time set a target for avoiding global warming for the period after 2012.
Read more »

March 2005
Lignite policy threatens climate strategies
Three large lignite-fired power stations were commissioned in Germany ..
Read more »

March 2005
No new climate targets
The Commission wants the EU to explore options for a post-2012 strategy with ..
Read more »

December 2004
Major reductions needed
The low-carbon scenario decribed by the Commission, including reductions ..
Read more »

March 2004
Ancillary benefits
A substantial part of the control costs for carbon dioxide reduction can be ..
Read more »

December 2003
Ending coal use
The simplest and cheapest way to bring down European emissions of CO2 as well ..
Read more »



The Swedish NGO Secretariat on Acid Rain, Box 7005, SE-402 31 Göteborg, Sweden.
Phone. +46-31-711 45 15, Fax +46-31-711 46 20, info@acidrain.org
To Main Page The Secretariat